VIDEO CENTER
What a second Trump presidency could mean for your finances
- November 10, 2024
- 28 Comments
- Less than a minute
- 28 Views
- 4 weeks ago
-
- by: @Jerrard1983
- 4 weeks ago
He doesn’t understand that for decades the US has abandoned certain industries. For example to now produce most clothing in the US puts it a luxury price point. And there are not enough facilities to even accommodate Americas biggest clothing manufacturers IE gap or Ralph Lauren.
-
- by: @Nooneknows-d1m
- 4 weeks ago
I went to get groceries and prices when up from last week. He’s not in yet and prices went up!!
-
- by: @lg-ii6pm
- 4 weeks ago
I wouldn’t be surprised if Musk saying that we will feel pain means they are planning to destabilize the US financial system to get people to move money to crypto. He and all those crypto guys who bought Trump will get even richer and we will pay the price. Then i suspect they will buy assets on the cheap after tanking the market.
-
- by: @robertevans1343
- 4 weeks ago
👍🏾
-
- by: @djeto2525
- 4 weeks ago
DOW increase and Bitcoin current bull run
-
- by: @underground9260
- 4 weeks ago
Who’s ready for another 2008 recession? Well if that happens, at least our interest rates will drop so I can refinance my home.
-
- by: @duanemcquillin9343
- 4 weeks ago
We don’t want to make the deficit higher? Stop the Ukraine war. Look we were ALL much better off under Trump! You people act like your experts. The current administration…put us in the dungeon.
-
- by: @Jacklal24
- 4 weeks ago
America is all mixed up. Hope Trump can fix things.
-
- by: @Tigerfan31200
- 4 weeks ago
Not ok when Trump cuts healthcare for everyone
-
- by: @xedrone883
- 4 weeks ago
I heard tariffs are going to cost 3k 2k 1.5k where is the evidence instead of telling me
-
- by: @galacticmaui2
- 4 weeks ago
Unchecked capitalism at its finest 👲
-
- by: @eliot7964
- 4 weeks ago
The only people getting rich from Trump is going to be Trump and his billionaire owners.
-
- by: @DovesDescent
- 4 weeks ago
I’m can’t wait to see when everyone here is wrong on these tariffs and the economy starts thriving again.
-
- by: @MarvinLambert-y6h
- 4 weeks ago
Trump 2028
-
- by: @Green_House
- 4 weeks ago
The short euphoria of success is far outweighed by the YEARS of regret ! 🤔
-
- by: @frankenstang4729
- 4 weeks ago
Is this where the "blue wall" has gathered? 🤣 figured yall would have your shaved heads for profile pics 😉 enough jokes… we dodged a bullet with one already 😂😂 seriously though, the economy was great during his first term he can definitely do it his second. Thanks everyone who voted 😁
-
- by: @TheTrueOnyxRose
- 4 weeks ago
I didn’t understand anything of this.
-
- by: @Baby_duck4
- 4 weeks ago
Thank goodness I'm one of the few rich people who will gain from this Trump presidency 😂😂 poor little MAGA peasants whomp-whomp
-
- by: @Pulpos999
- 4 weeks ago
My finances are gonna plummet because of all the alcohol I'm gonna have to drink to deal with the insane, racist and stupid things this trash of a human being will say…
-
- by: @BabySJ1116
- 4 weeks ago
Say goodbye to that Christmas bonus. The company you work for is going to buy in bulk now before those tariffs are slapped onto their inventory. Say goodbye to that raise because those higher ups will definitely NOT be going without a raise/bonus for themselves FIRST. Enjoy that free pat on the back instead for all your hard work cause that’s all you’ll be getting.
-
- by: @MaxWritesforKids
- 4 weeks ago
No the this Host Sandwich. Gross.
-
- by: @screenapple1660
- 4 weeks ago
You might hear something interesting about Trump… Imagine a scenario where a billionaire family inherits a fortune, but the heir has an intellectual disability. Trump is expected to sign a bill that could require banks to step in and provide extra protection for such assets, shielding them from lawsuits, scams, and other financial risks. In other words, this would be a form of Secure Asset Protection, which could grant banks the authority to control and manage these massive assets for those with intellectual disabilities.
The new law might prevent these funds from being equally distributed among individuals, including the poor. For instance, if a child with a disability—such as the child of actor Colin Farrell—inherits a significant fortune, they could be entitled to protection akin to "John Wick" security. This means banks could step in with highly secure measures to protect their assets and prevent scammers from exploiting vulnerabilities or beating the system. -
- by: @johnmanigaulte1556
- 4 weeks ago
YOUR FINANCES WILL COLLAPSE! WHY? BECAUSE WE ARE HEADING FULL-SPEED TOWARDS CIVIL WAR! Governors need to do a LOT MORE than take Trump to court to fight his economy-killing tariffs! They need to prepare for the very likely probability that Trump will dismiss honorable generals and admirals from our armed services and replace them with MAGA loyalists. Trump's Senate will surely consent to such a reconfiguring of our military.
After that, Trump can defy OUR Federal Constitution with impunity. The Founders, in the Anti-Federalist Papers (P. 45), predicted our present plight: "The more the people are discontented with the oppression of taxes; the greater need the prince has of money to distribute to his partizans and pay the troops that are to suppress all resistance, and enable him to plunder at pleasure." Shouldn't we at least LISTEN to what the Founders had to say before they created our Federal Constitution? Shouldn't we at least STUDY their analysis of danger by way of tyrants (i.e., princes, kings, etc.)?
Basically, we need to PREDICT Trump's villainy BEFORE it happens! Here is why: "The President’s power to dismiss an officer from the service, once unlimited, is today confined by statute in time of peace to dismissal pursuant to a sentence of a general court-martial or in commutation of a sentence of a court-martial. But the provision is not regarded by the Court as preventing the President from displacing an officer of the Army or Navy by appointing with the advice and consent of the Senate another person in his or her place." SEE: Art II, S2. 1.13 of the Constitution Annotated.
LEGAL AF needs to review Mullan v. United States, 140 U.S. 140 (1891) and Wallace v. United States, 257 U.S. 541 (1922)
Governors and citizens alike need to recognize that once Trump reconfigures the military, all hope of fighting him in the courts disappears in a hundred or more puffs of smoke from an army of long guns trained upon citizens and national guardsmen. Did we forget that our legal system (somehow) could NOT remove Trump from office for inciting an insurrection? Wallace v. United States informs us that Trump can effectuate a "legal" military coup, with help from the Senate.
LEGAL-AF needs to OPEN THE LAW BOOKS and observe the means by which Trump can become America's first tyrant-king. Like Kim Jong Un, he probably wants to pass on leadership to his sons, when old age enfeebles him even more than it has so far.
Our GOVERNORS need to prepare for the very likely probability that they will have to use their national guards to protect the lives (and freedoms) of their citizens.
My father served in WWI and was a decorated war hero. He later became a professorial historian. He taught me to "look to history," if I would like to better understand what is happening in the political forum in front of my shocked eyes and ears. I still cannot believe —can YOU believe?—that an insurrectionist like Trump was not tossed in a prison cell immediately after January 6th?
We have become, it appears, Bonhoeffers' "fools," people who could not see the writing on the wall. -
- by: @Progressive_James
- 4 weeks ago
All I heard was, "Brace for impact" Where was this messaging before the election? I can tell you. They wanted Trump elected because it's good for headlines. I will never watch the Today Show again.
-
- by: @mt_gox
- 4 weeks ago
Hilarious watching clueless MSM commies explaining economics. 😅
-
- by: @robertdoran9387
- 4 weeks ago
Wall Street loves Biden.
-
- by: @PatriciaComstock
- 4 weeks ago
Please find concrete suggestions for the millions of those at or below poverty line. They could care less about economic advice and don't input…many at this level don't make enough to pay income tax.
-
- by: @PatriciaComstock
- 4 weeks ago
What?!! Again who are you not talking to????
Leave feedback about this