Public choice, often referred to as “politics without romance,” strips away the idealistic imagery of public officials working for the common good. Instead, it delves into the complexities of politics, revealing issues such as log-rolling, rent seeking, and power concentration.
In the pursuit of a solution to the problems illuminated by public choice, some advocates suggest abolishing politics altogether. However, this notion faces significant challenges. Firstly, reforming institutions and incentives must navigate the existing political landscape, with all its flaws. Secondly, politics serves a purpose; it reflects the intricate web of human interactions and interests.
Adam Smith’s concept of the “man of system” highlights the fallacy of comprehensive planning in society. Smith recognized the necessity of compromise and political action in implementing change effectively. Political structures, interests, and groups play crucial roles in guiding societal progress.
James Buchanan emphasized the need to view politicians and bureaucrats as participants in a system of mutual gain. The belief that limiting politics will resolve its issues oversimplifies the intricate nature of governance. Institutions are not static background conditions but subject to change and manipulation.
Efforts to depoliticize society can lead to either authoritarian control or democratic persuasion. The former concentrates power in non-democratic institutions, risking abuse of authority. The latter, while challenging, upholds democratic values by engaging people as equals in the political process.
In essence, the path to lasting change lies in democratic dialogue and persuasion, embracing the messiness of politics while preserving individual autonomy. It may not offer a perfect solution, but it upholds democratic and liberal principles, which should be the ultimate goal.
