The government seems to have a habit of doling out Band-Aids for self-inflicted injuries, expecting voters to remember the gesture come election day. Minnesota’s recent edict on minimum pay rates for rideshare drivers is a prime example of this phenomenon.
At the outset, Minneapolis passed a regulation setting minimum pay rates for rideshare drivers. This move prompted Lyft to pull out of the city, and Uber to withdraw from the entire Twin Cities metro area. Alternative services were anticipated to step in, but none materialized.
The Minnesota Reformer highlighted the delay in enacting the new rates. Nearly two months after the ordinance was established, only Uber and Lyft operated in the city. The reason? Barriers to entry, akin to obstacles hindering competition within an industry.
The barriers in Minneapolis took the form of exorbitant fees and strict regulations. For instance, MyWeels became the sole licensed ride-hail alternative in Minneapolis and St. Paul after paying hefty annual fees. The founder of MyWeels mentioned that capital access, not groundbreaking technology or a large pool of drivers, set his company apart.
Securing investors is the main challenge for Uber and Lyft alternatives. To operate in Minneapolis, St. Paul, and at the airport, transportation network companies must obtain commercial insurance, with steep premiums totaling about $150,000 per year. Joiryde’s CEO opted out of entering the Twin Cities due to high licensing fees and unclear insurance costs.
The state’s legislative session stumbled over these issues. Eventually, Minnesota implemented minimum pay rates for rideshare drivers that were lower than what Minneapolis proposed. Consequently, Uber and Lyft opted to stay in Minnesota. However, the fate of alternative services remained uncertain.
Wridz, a service operational in multiple states, faced licensing hurdles in St. Paul. The company’s applications were under review, barring them from authorized passenger pick-ups. MOOV, another competitor, grappled with steep licensing fees in Minneapolis and St. Paul, stalling its launch.
This regulatory saga showcased a market with increased consolidation, where larger companies monopolized the economy. It underscored the government’s role in shaping this trend and raised doubts about whether governmental intervention could rectify the situation it caused.
In the midst of this, there was talk of a state-initiated rideshare app. A state senator proposed this idea, practically holding it as a political trump card. Come election time, voters should remember who administered that temporary fix.
John Phelan, an Economist at the Center of the American Experiment, sheds light on these perplexing affairs.
Leave feedback about this