The Impact of Executive Orders on Gender Identity Data Collection
When Robert Santos resigned as Director of the U.S. Census Bureau, he shed light on how President Trump’s executive order targeting gender identity had significant repercussions on the collection of statistics crucial for protecting the rights of transgender individuals. Here’s a breakdown of the changes made by the Census Bureau, the implications of these alterations, and the challenges faced by federal agencies in upholding data integrity.
- Removal of Gender Identity Questions from Surveys:
- The National Crime Victimization Survey and the National Health Interview Survey were among the surveys from which gender identity questions were removed.
- The Survey of Sexual Victimization saw alterations made to questions and terminology to align with Trump’s Executive Order 14168.
- The Household Trends and Outlook Pulse Survey proposed eliminating questions related to gender identity.
- Impact on Research and Data Analysis:
- The suspension of research into adding gender identity and sexual orientation questions to the American Community Survey has left a critical gap in demographic data.
- The Department of Justice’s initial request for LGBTQ+ questions in the American Community Survey stalled during the first Trump administration.
- Legal Challenges and Public Feedback:
- Lawsuits challenging Executive Order 14168 have been filed, highlighting concerns about limitations on gender identity data collection.
- Advocates emphasize the importance of public involvement in decisions to remove questions from federal surveys.
The Journey Ahead for the U.S. Census Bureau:
Despite the upheaval caused by recent executive orders, the Census Bureau faces a critical juncture in ensuring the integrity of data collection processes. The burden falls on federal agencies to navigate challenging terrain while upholding scientific integrity and transparency.
As new leadership steps in to fill Robert Santos’s position, it is imperative to prioritize non-partisan approaches to statistical collection. By maintaining a commitment to robust data analysis and adherence to legal standards, the Census Bureau can navigate these turbulent times and continue providing valuable demographic insights for policymakers. The ongoing legal battles and policy shifts underscore the need for public engagement and accountability in safeguarding data collection practices. Let us strive to uphold the integrity of data collection and statistical analysis, ensuring all voices are heard and accounted for in the narrative of our nation’s demographic landscape.
Leave feedback about this