Throughout history, there have been instances where governance has crossed the line of power and authority. From unelected officials imposing their agenda to radical mobs disguising themselves as protesters, the abuse of power is a dangerous threat to a free society. As Mark Twain aptly put it, “History doesn’t repeat itself, but it often rhymes.”
The recent trend of Democrats turning to federal judges to circumvent the traditional democratic process is concerning. With judgments delivered against President Donald Trump’s policies and decisions, it raises flags about the separation of powers in the government. The alignment of certain judges with ideological beliefs creates a scenario where the judiciary branch is overstepping into areas beyond its intended jurisdiction.
Looking back at the warnings from figures like Elbridge Gerry and the Federalist Papers, the fears of judicial imposition and activism are not new. Alexander Hamilton’s caution about judges prioritizing personal will over judgment in interpreting laws is a stark reminder of the importance of judicial impartiality.
The frequency of activist courts overreaching their powers is on the rise, with examples dating back to previous administrations and landmark cases. Judges interfering with executive orders and intervening in nonjusticiable matters demonstrate the erosion of the checks and balances within the government.
From ordering tax increases to releasing criminals based on overcrowding, the examples of judicial overreach are numerous. A reminder from Judge Diarmuid O’Scannlain about the integrity of our constitutional democracy highlights the need for accountability and responsibility within the judiciary system.
To preserve the essence of a constitutional republic, it is essential for all citizens, regardless of political affiliations, to reject any form of judicial overreach. The essence of government being “of the people, by the people, for the people” must remain a guiding principle, with judges upholding the law rather than creating it. At stake is not just the balance of power but the very foundation of democracy itself.
Leave feedback about this