In the ever-evolving world of investment, trends come and go as swiftly as the tides. David Swensen, the late Chief Investment Officer of the Yale Investments Office, once aptly noted that when the majority adopts a contrarian position, the minority’s view transforms into the widely accepted perspective.
Private credit funds have been the talk of the town in recent years, with surges in capital raising and projections for even greater inflows down the line. Institutional investment plans are front and center in this investment surge, driven by the relentless advocacy of investment consultants urging for further allocations.
Alternative Investment Cycles
Venturing into the historical archives of the financial world unveils a rich tapestry of alternative asset classes—each with its rise, shine, and eventual downturn. The cycle of alternative investments unfolds in three distinct stages:
- Formation: Emerging from a market void.
- Early Phase: Enjoying stellar returns from limited opportunities.
- Flood Phase: Flooded with new funds and investments, leading to diminished returns.
Sadly, the alternative asset classes seldom lived up to the hype, often serving as value detractors rather than enhancers, despite their inherent allure. Trustees fervently embraced these alternative investments even as the evidence of their lackluster performance mounted over time, contrary to the promises of outperformance often peddled by investment consultants.
The Dynamics of the Private Credit Boom
The aftermath of the 2008/2009 global financial crisis birthed the private credit boom. A phenomenon not entirely ground-breaking, the latest iteration of private credit appropriated the limited partnership model to allure investors. However, the costs—high fees, extended illiquidity periods, and obscured risk profiles—mostly burdened the investors rather than the fund managers.
Investment Consulting and Mean-Variance Obfuscation
Investment consultants lured trustees into the private credit whirlpool, championing complex asset allocation strategies and active management based on mean-variance optimization (MVO) models. While MVO offers a simplified method of risk assessment and return maximization, its applicability to highly convoluted assets like private credit remains limited due to the volatility of input data and optimistic return projections skewed by previous successes.
Barbarians at the Unguarded Gates
Consultants, driven by profit motives and the need for continued client patronage, push trustees into uncharted investment territories without proving their worth or track record. Oblivious to the risks and downsides, trustees often succumb to the consultants’ vague assurances of value addition without demanding transparency and accountability.
In conclusion, private credit isn’t a pristine oasis waiting to be discovered but a murky quagmire teeming with uncertainties and opportunists. Before diving headfirst into these investment waters, trustees must question and scrutinize their consultants, demand accountability, assess risks, and ensure any recommendations align with proven expertise and verifiable success. It’s time to challenge the status quo, tread carefully, and safeguard investment portfolios against the deluge of ill-advised decisions.
Leave feedback about this