Exploring South Korea’s Push for Capital Market Reforms
Embarking on a journey across continents, South Korean officials are on a mission to attract global investors’ attention towards the country’s latest wave of capital market reforms. Rooted in a longstanding issue of undervalued listed companies, these reforms aim to combat corporate governance flaws and the neglect of minority shareholders, often a consequence of the powerful chaebol conglomerates dominating the landscape.
Here are some key points to understand the current landscape of capital market reforms in South Korea:
- The “corporate value-up program” introduces measures such as a new index to showcase improved capital efficiency and tax incentives for firms emphasizing shareholder returns. While not the first initiative to tackle the “Korea discount”, this renewed effort has gained momentum due to various factors.
- A surge in local retail investors, demographic challenges, and fears of slowing growth have pushed capital market reforms into the limelight of South Korea’s political agenda.
- Inspired by Tokyo’s success in unlocking shareholder value, South Korea seeks to learn from this model while facing pressure to act decisively.
- However, local advocates for reform remain skeptical of the efficacy of the proposed changes. They argue that the root cause of undervaluation lies in controlling shareholders who prioritize personal gain over minority interests, leading to mergers and actions detrimental to diverse stakeholders.
A Test Case Unfolding: Doosan’s Restructuring Proposal
- Highlighting the challenges of corporate governance, a controversial restructuring within the Doosan conglomerate has sparked opposition from minority shareholders.
- The proposed merger between Doosan Bobcat and Doosan Robotics has raised concerns over valuation discrepancies, favoring the latter at the expense of the former.
- Critics argue that the merger undervalues profitable entities while overvaluing loss-making subsidiaries, leading to significant shareholder dilution and family shareholders’ increased control.
- Despite pushback from activist funds and investors, Doosan’s CFO defends the transaction, insisting on compliance with regulatory norms and alignment with the government’s reform agenda.
Implications and Outlook: Towards a Fiduciary Duty Framework
- The Doosan case serves as a wake-up call for regulators and policymakers to address governance gaps and protect shareholder interests more effectively.
- The proposed restructuring has ignited calls for introducing a fiduciary duty towards shareholders in the commercial code, a groundbreaking step in South Korea.
- Advocates believe that instilling fiduciary responsibilities in company directors can prevent undue influence from majority shareholders, fostering a fairer environment for all stakeholders.
- Collaborative efforts between lawmakers, academics, investors, and legal experts aim to pave the way for comprehensive governance reforms, ensuring a more transparent and accountable corporate landscape.
In conclusion, South Korea’s journey towards capital market reforms reflects a pivotal moment in reshaping corporate governance practices and safeguarding shareholder rights. By addressing longstanding discrepancies and embracing fiduciary duties, the country can unlock new pathways for sustainable growth and investor confidence in its markets. Embracing change and holding companies accountable are essential steps towards building a robust and equitable business ecosystem for all stakeholders involved.
Leave feedback about this