In a bold move that has the potential to disrupt the entertainment industry yet again, Hollywood’s video game performers have announced that they are going on strike as contract negotiations broke down over artificial intelligence protections. This strike marks the second time video game voice actors and motion capture performers affiliated with the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists are taking such action, with the strike set to commence at 12:01 a.m. Friday after nearly two years of failed negotiations with top gaming studios, including divisions of Activision, Warner Bros., and Walt Disney Co.
The crux of the issue lies in the regulation of generative AI, with the two sides at a standstill over the definitions of who constitutes a “performer.” While the studios claim to have offered AI protections, SAG-AFTRA’s negotiating committee argues that not everyone involved in rendering movement performance qualifies as a performer covered by the collective bargaining agreement. This discrepancy could potentially give game companies the ability to train AI to replicate an actor’s voice or create digital likenesses without consent or fair compensation, a scenario the union deems unacceptable.
Here are some of the key points and stances surrounding the strike:
Negotiations have revolved around wages, job safety, and generative AI regulation, with the latter being the main point of contention that led to the strike.
The industry’s perspective on the definition of a “performer” is a critical factor in the stalemate between the two sides.
Without proper safeguards, performers could risk having their voices or likenesses replicated through AI without their authorization.
SAG-AFTRA emphasizes that the strike is a last resort after exhausting all other negotiation possibilities.
Despite claims of being close to a deal, the union chose to walk away from negotiations due to persistent concerns regarding AI protections and how they could affect various types of performers.
While game companies argue that their offer extends meaningful AI protections, the union remains steadfast in its demand for comprehensive coverage of all performers, regardless of their appearance or sound.
As the strike unfolds, it is evident that the driving force behind the video game industry’s success are the game designers and performers whose creative contributions bring these virtual worlds to life.
Ultimately, the strike is a testament to the crucial role that performers play in the gaming industry and their unwavering commitment to securing fair treatment and protections in the rapidly evolving landscape of interactive media. As the industry grapples with the ethical implications of AI integration, it is imperative that both parties come to a mutually beneficial agreement that respects the performers’ rights and contributions. The outcome of this strike will not only impact the future of video game production but also set a precedent for how creative labor is valued and protected in the digital age.
