Maryland Legislators Debate Tax Proposals Amid Budget Deficit
As Maryland grapples with a chronic budget deficit, Governor Moore’s tax plan has sparked heated discussions among state legislators. While the governor’s proposal remains under scrutiny, several additional tax proposals have been introduced to boost revenue. These new measures primarily target businesses, seeking to generate income to address the looming fiscal shortfall.
- Business-to-Business (B2B) Services Tax
- The introduction of a 2.5 percent tax on B2B services (H.B. 1554 and S.B. 1045) has stirred controversy. This proposal encompasses various services provided by businesses to other businesses, such as accounting, IT services, consulting, and more.
- Unlike traditional sales taxes, targeting B2B services could have far-reaching implications. It risks distorting economic decisions, increasing tax pyramiding, and burdening consumers with higher prices.
- Taxing business inputs goes against principles of neutrality and transparency, creating a less competitive environment for local firms. Exempting these inputs under the existing sales tax remains a preferred option to maintain fairness.
- Data Broker Gross Income Tax
- A proposal (H.B. 1089 and S.B. 904) suggests levying a 6 percent tax on data brokers’ gross income. While expected to generate revenues, this tax poses challenges for affected businesses and could lead to higher costs for consumers.
- The introduction of a data broker tax, coupled with existing corporate income taxes, could undermine Maryland’s tax competitiveness. An additional layer of taxation on a specific industry raises concerns about economic implications and fairness.
- Worldwide Combined Reporting
- The Fair Share for Maryland Act of 2025 (H.B. 1014 and S.B. 859) aims to make Governor Moore’s tax plan more progressive. Mandatory worldwide combined reporting would be implemented, a move unprecedented at the state level.
- Worldwide combined reporting introduces complexities and may result in double taxation for certain corporations. Implementing this system could increase costs for in-state businesses and potentially have negative revenue effects.
In Conclusion
Maryland faces a significant budget deficit that demands strategic tax policy decisions. While Governor Moore’s cost-cutting measures are prudent, legislators should carefully consider revenue-raising options. Opting for growth-neutral, transparent policies, like broadening the sales tax base, could offer a more sustainable solution.
By subscribing to updates from tax experts, Maryland residents can stay informed on the evolving tax landscape and its impact on the state’s fiscal future.
Leave feedback about this