As the nation eagerly awaited the unveiling of the 2025 Budget, a bombshell claim from Opposition Leader Kamla Persad-Bissessar sent shockwaves through the political landscape. Accusing the Prime Minister’s Office of being allocated a staggering $50 million for “feteing,” Persad-Bissessar’s allegations sparked a heated debate that captured the attention of the entire country.
In response to the accusations, Finance Minister Colm Imbert defended the government’s decision to increase the allocation for entertainment and functions hosted by the Prime Minister’s Office from $890,000 in 2024 to $50 million in 2025. However, Persad-Bissessar remained adamant in her criticism, slamming the Prime Minister for indulging in lavish celebrations amid a backdrop of austerity for the nation.
Here are some key points and revelations that emerged from this contentious debate:
- Persad-Bissessar raised concerns about the allocation of $400 million for “unknown buildings” under the prime ministerial vote, questioning the transparency and necessity of such expenditures.
- In a spirited defense of his administration’s spending, Prime Minister Dr. Keith Rowley emphasized that his office’s expenditure had always been “frugal” during his tenure.
- Drawing a sharp contrast, Rowley highlighted the extravagant expenses incurred by Persad-Bissessar’s administration from 2010 to 2015, totaling a staggering $170 million, including $47.8 million for events.
The revelations and arguments put forth by both sides ignited a fierce debate across the nation, with citizens divided over the justifiability of such allocations in the midst of economic challenges. As we navigate through these tumultuous times, it remains crucial for transparency and accountability to guide our leaders in their decision-making processes. Let us demand accountability and prudent management of public funds to ensure a prosperous future for all.
Leave feedback about this