Unlock Exclusive Insights from the FT Editor for Free
The world is constantly evolving, and so are the threats we face. The insurance sector, specifically against terrorism, is no exception to this change. Recently, Pool Re’s CEO, Tom Clementi, raised concerns about the obsolescence and irrelevance the UK’s specialist insurer could face due to evolving threats of state-sponsored attacks. This has sparked a conversation about the changing landscape of terror risk and the need for adaptation within the insurance industry.
Here are some key points to consider from Clementi’s interview with the Financial Times:
- Pool Re’s business model is being overhauled to reflect the bifurcation of terror risk into low-sophistication attacks and more complex threats. The insurance sector must adapt to these changes in order to effectively mitigate systemic risks.
- The age-old debate of where terrorism ends and war begins has been revived. The line between the two is becoming increasingly blurred in today’s geopolitical landscape, raising questions about the relevance of traditional insurance models.
- Since its inception in 1993, Pool Re has provided backup cover for insurers in the aftermath of terrorist attacks, including the Manchester Arena bombing in 2017. However, the rise of cyber threats and unconventional terror poses new challenges that require innovative solutions from the insurance industry.
- Private insurers have been reluctant to cover state-backed attacks due to the potential for massive damage. However, this leaves clients vulnerable to hackers affiliated with foreign adversaries. The need for government intervention to backstop the market and cover major losses has become increasingly apparent.
- Pool Re’s scheme is only activated when the government certifies an event as an act of terrorism. This certification process is crucial in determining the reinsurance coverage for insurers and ensuring clarity for all parties involved.
- The £6.9bn reserve and commercial insurance purchases give Pool Re a significant buffer against major attacks, but the government guarantee remains essential for covering CBRN attacks, which have the greatest destructive potential.
In conclusion, the evolving nature of terrorism and state-sponsored threats requires a proactive approach from the insurance industry. Pool Re’s adaptation to these changing risks is crucial in maintaining its relevance and effectiveness in providing coverage for future attacks. Collaboration between insurers, governments, and clients is essential to ensure preparedness and resilience in the face of emerging threats.
Leave feedback about this