As the late afternoon sun casts a warm glow over Major’s Hill Park in Ottawa, a striking scene unfolds on the western side of the park. Tall corn stalks sway gently in the breeze, accompanied by scarlet beans winding their way up and adorning the corn with vibrant orange flowers. Delicate squashes are beginning to form on the soil below, while bees and pollinators flutter around purple salvia flowers and wild strawberries, creating a picturesque and inviting display of urban agriculture.
Surrounding this bountiful scene are crude steel barricades, typically used for crowd control, silently conveying a message: this food is off-limits for consumption. The National Capital Commission, responsible for this initiative, aims to showcase the potential for growing a variety of food crops in urban Ottawa as a means to address food insecurity. However, the message seems conflicting as the fruits and vegetables are not meant to be eaten.
Erin Beagle, the executive director of the Roots Community Food Centre, finds the approach perplexing. While she appreciates the inspiration that urban food growing can provide, she questions the effectiveness of growing food in public spaces only to restrict access to it. The notion of food being grown to combat food insecurity, yet forbidden for consumption, seems paradoxical and counterintuitive.
The NCC justifies the barricades, citing concerns about potential contamination of the soil and varying water sources used for irrigation, which could render the food unfit for consumption. However, the glaring reality of food insecurity and inequality in the city, exemplified by homelessness, poverty, and rising living costs, highlights the urgency of addressing these issues through tangible and accessible solutions.
Despite the NCC’s efforts to promote sustainability and access to food through urban agriculture, the conflicting message surrounding the restriction of food access raises questions about the effectiveness of such initiatives. By restricting access to food grown in public spaces, the intended goal of addressing food insecurity may be hindered, reinforcing existing barriers rather than breaking them down.
In conclusion, while the NCC’s emphasis on urban agriculture and showcasing Indigenous agricultural practices is commendable, the restrictive measures around access to the food grown in Major’s Hill Park raise concerns about the effectiveness and impact of such initiatives. To truly address food insecurity and promote dignified food access, a more inclusive and community-oriented approach that allows for interaction with and consumption of the food grown in public spaces may be more fruitful in creating lasting change.
Leave feedback about this