Google’s recent clash with the Department of Justice regarding its alleged antitrust violations has triggered a back-and-forth of proposed solutions. The DOJ’s initial suggestion of mandating Google to sell off Chrome was met with a swift response from the tech giant. Instead of divesting Chrome, Android, or Google Play, Google proposed a set of remedies that focus on addressing its payment agreements with major companies, licensing deals with Android phone manufacturers, and contracts with wireless carriers.
Here is Google’s proposed list of solutions to tackle the issue at hand:
- Halting deals that tie licenses for Search, Chrome, and Google Play with the placement of other Google apps
- Allowing multiple agreements for default search placement across various platforms
- Requiring annual reviews of all agreements to ensure fair competition
Google’s stance on the matter emphasizes that the suggestions put forth by the DOJ primarily target its search distribution contracts. Highlighting the importance of these contracts, Google’s regulatory VP, Lee-Anne Mulholland, stated that the proposed remedies would specifically address these concerns.
Despite the impending legal battle and plan to appeal the judgment labeling Google as a monopolist, the company is set to present a revised proposal on March 7th. This revised plan precedes the scheduled two-week trial in April and aims to find a middle ground that balances fair competition with Google’s business practices.
In conclusion, the ongoing dispute between Google and the DOJ showcases a critical juncture in the tech industry’s regulatory landscape. As both sides strive to find common ground, the outcome of this clash could potentially shape the future of competition in the search engine market.
