In a world full of cosmic threats and daily struggles, economist Noah Smith reminds us that the universe seemingly conspires against us at every turn. The constant pull towards poverty is just another battle we must face in our journey through life. Join Russ Roberts and Noah Smith as they delve into the allure of nostalgia for the 1950s in films and TV shows, and discuss the harsh reality faced by contestants on survival shows who attempt to live the life of late 1800’s farmers.
- The Elemental Foe: Smith paints poverty as an elemental foe, a force that threatens our very survival. This metaphor highlights the primal nature of poverty compared to other modern threats such as nuclear war or climate change. It challenges us to rethink our perspectives on poverty and its impact on our lives.
- Industrial Modernity: The concept of industrial modernity is described as a system of technological marvels that uphold our modern way of life. Adam Smith, in his Wealth of Nations, laid the groundwork for this vision with his insights on the division of labor. His foresight paved the way for the intricate web of technologies that define our industrial age today.
- Technological Unemployment: The paradox of labor-saving technologies is a dilemma as old as time. As we grapple with the future of AI and automation, the potential consequences of technological unemployment loom large. What risks are we overlooking, and what opportunities are we underestimating? The conversation continues as we navigate the uncertain waters of technological progress.
- The Industrial Revolution’s Delay: Roberts and Smith ponder on why the Industrial Revolution didn’t occur sooner, despite the presence of key technologies in ancient civilizations like Rome, China, and Latin America. The extent of the market, prevailing institutions, and other economic factors may offer insights into this historical delay. What factors inhibited progress and impeded industrialization for centuries?
- Degrowth vs. Technological Advancements: The debate rages on about the necessity of degrowth to combat environmental degradation. Some argue that technological advancements can curb resource consumption, while others advocate for degrowth as the only viable solution. Can Noah Smith’s vision of a united front in the battle for our future reconcile these divergent approaches? Is there hope for a collaborative effort to achieve sustainability?
As we explore these topics of the past, present, and future, let’s remember that our collective actions shape the world we live in. Let’s continue to engage, question, and innovate as we strive for a better tomorrow. Our future is in our hands, and together, we can overcome the challenges that lie ahead.
