Amidst the scenic backdrop of Busan, South Korea, the fifth and purportedly final conference of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC) on plastic pollution concluded without a concrete global treaty to tackle this pressing issue. The inability of negotiators to reach a consensus at INC-5 underscores the complex challenges in addressing the escalating problem of plastic pollution on a worldwide scale.
The United Nations (UN) initiative that began in March 2022 aimed to develop a binding global instrument to combat plastic pollution. Despite efforts that involved over 3,300 delegates from more than 170 nations, the recent setback at INC-5 means that additional negotiations will be necessary in 2025 to finalize a comprehensive and effective treaty.
Here are some key points that shed light on the nuances and controversies surrounding the discussions at the conference:
- Proposals such as production caps and phasing out specific chemicals and products remain contentious, creating divergences between different factions. Countries like Saudi Arabia advocate for improved waste management strategies, favored by the plastics industry, while the High Ambition Coalition (HAC) comprising nations like those in Europe and the UAE push for stringent limits on plastic production.
- The stance of the United States on curbing plastic pollution has evolved, with the Biden administration aligning itself with the HAC position. However, uncertainties surrounding the US’s commitment post-election pose challenges for adopting these high-ambition measures.
- Business interests and environmental concerns further complicate reaching a consensus. While the Business Coalition for a Global Plastics Treaty supports global phase-outs, the inconclusive outcome in Busan raises uncertainties for affected industries in terms of investment strategies.
- Industry advocates, like the American Chemistry Council (ACC), emphasize waste management improvements over supply restrictions or chemical bans that could conflict with existing UN agreements. On the other hand, environmental groups like the World Wildlife Fund and the Ocean Conservancy push for global bans on harmful plastics and chemicals, along with robust financing mechanisms for developing countries.
In the wake of the deadlock at the conference, Ecuador’s Ambassador Luis Vayas Valdivieso, who chaired the INC, urged continued engagement to achieve the ambitious mandate of tackling plastic pollution. The insights gained from the Busan negotiations will serve as a foundation for future discussions at INC-5.2 in 2025, showcasing the diverse perspectives and contrasting viewpoints among government, business, and environmental stakeholders in combatting plastic pollution.
The unresolved issues surrounding plastic pollution underscore the urgent need for collaborative solutions and decisive actions to safeguard our planet for future generations. It is imperative for countries to unite in implementing binding measures to end plastic pollution, develop comprehensive bans, and strengthen the treaty over time. By working together, we can make meaningful strides towards a cleaner, healthier environment for all.
Leave feedback about this